Claude Code vs ChatGPT Codex compared for performance, pricing, workflows, and privacy to find the best AI coding assistant ...

AI agents build something that mostly works but worries the project's creator An Anthropic researcher's efforts to get its newly released Opus 4.6 model to build a C compiler left him "excited," ...

Claude Code Agent Teams rely on contract-first planning for task handoffs, but token use can spike; learn how to reduce ...

At the core of the project was Claude Opus 4.6, which introduces a new “agent teams” capability. Instead of relying on a single large model session, Anthropic deployed multiple instances operating in ...

Kavin Bharti Mittal listed three products developed during the period, including cross-platform note-taking tools and an AI assistant.

It’s been a good few weeks for Anthropic. The lab is reportedly planning a $10 billion fundraising that would value the company at $350 billion, its CEO caused headlines in Davos by criticizing the ...

Sixteen autonomous AI agents collaborated to independently build a full C compiler, showcasing unprecedented progress in machine-driven software engineering.

Claude Opus 4.6 expands to a 1 million token context window and retrieves info at 76% success, improving large code reviews.

Anthropic’s agentic coding tool is changing how developers approach iOS app creation by automating planning, coding, ...

Over two weeks and nearly 2,000 Claude Code sessions costing about $20,000 in API fees, the AI model agents reportedly produced a 100,000-line Rust-based compiler capable of building a bootable Linux ...

For the AI model Opus 4.6, users of Claude Code now have a "Fast Mode" available, which enables significantly faster ...

I tested Claude Code vs. ChatGPT Codex in a real-world bug hunt and creative CLI build — here’s which AI coding agent thinks ...