I do not usually write about non-precedential Federal Circuit decisions, but I could not let the discussion of “simultaneous invention” in Columbia University v. Illumina, Inc., go without comment. As ...
“Evidence of simultaneous invention, on its own, is not sufficient for obviousness. However, such evidence can influence the determination of the level of skill in the art and whether there was ...
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results