I do not usually write about non-precedential Federal Circuit decisions, but I could not let the discussion of “simultaneous invention” in Columbia University v. Illumina, Inc., go without comment. As ...
“Evidence of simultaneous invention, on its own, is not sufficient for obviousness. However, such evidence can influence the determination of the level of skill in the art and whether there was ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results